On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 09:42:46AM -0600, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
> Is the attached refinement of this patch previously applied to mainline
> ok for backport to gcc 6? I have bootstrapped and tested without
> regressions on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu.
After 6.4 please.
Segher
Is the attached refinement of this patch previously applied to mainline
ok for backport to gcc 6? I have bootstrapped and tested without
regressions on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu.
This patch differs from the original mainline patch in the following
regards:
1. Certain commentary changes are
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 04:04:33PM -0600, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
> PR 80103 provides a test case which results in an internal
> compiler error when invoked with -mno-direct-move -mpower9-dform-
> vector target options. The internal compiler error results because
> these two target options are incomp
PR 80103 provides a test case which results in an internal
compiler error when invoked with -mno-direct-move -mpower9-dform-
vector target options. The internal compiler error results because
these two target options are incompatible with each other.
The enclosed patch simply disables this parti
