Re: [PATCH(es)] PR fortran/77391 -- RFC vote on which you prefer

2016-08-27 Thread Jerry DeLisle
On 08/26/2016 05:06 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: --- snip --- So, I've come up the following. We now need to debate whether Dominiq's observations mean that C402 does not apply to named constant. See my comment in the PR. The standard gives the explicit way to accomplish what the user wants to

Re: [PATCH(es)] PR fortran/77391 -- RFC vote on which you prefer

2016-08-26 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:28:25PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote: > Hello, > > Le 26/08/2016 à 20:27, Steve Kargl a écrit : > > Here are two possible patches for PR fortran/77391. The first > > patch treats the invalid code as a GNU Fortran extension as > > gfortran current accepts the invalid code.

Re: [PATCH(es)] PR fortran/77391 -- RFC vote on which you prefer

2016-08-26 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:28:25PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote: > Hello, > > Le 26/08/2016 à 20:27, Steve Kargl a écrit : > > Here are two possible patches for PR fortran/77391. The first > > patch treats the invalid code as a GNU Fortran extension as > > gfortran current accepts the invalid code.

Re: [PATCH(es)] PR fortran/77391 -- RFC vote on which you prefer

2016-08-26 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:28:25PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote: > Hello, > > Le 26/08/2016 à 20:27, Steve Kargl a écrit : > > Here are two possible patches for PR fortran/77391. The first > > patch treats the invalid code as a GNU Fortran extension as > > gfortran current accepts the invalid code.

Re: [PATCH(es)] PR fortran/77391 -- RFC vote on which you prefer

2016-08-26 Thread Mikael Morin
Hello, Le 26/08/2016 à 20:27, Steve Kargl a écrit : Here are two possible patches for PR fortran/77391. The first patch treats the invalid code as a GNU Fortran extension as gfortran current accepts the invalid code. The second patch enforces the standard. As I think gfortran should

Re: [PATCH(es)] PR fortran/77391 -- RFC vote on which you prefer

2016-08-26 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Hi Steve, I am strongly for the enforcement of the standard. Please apply patch #2. Cheers Paul On 26 August 2016 at 20:27, Steve Kargl wrote: > Here are two possible patches for PR fortran/77391. The first > patch treats the invalid code as a GNU Fortran

[PATCH(es)] PR fortran/77391 -- RFC vote on which you prefer

2016-08-26 Thread Steve Kargl
Here are two possible patches for PR fortran/77391. The first patch treats the invalid code as a GNU Fortran extension as gfortran current accepts the invalid code. The second patch enforces the standard. As I think gfortran should encourage standard conformance, I am inclined to commit the