This bug fixes PR 68404, which created an insn for the fusion operation when
accessing an array with a large constant offset that the downstream passes
(regrenam in particular don't like). Because fusion in general adds so little
to the performance of power8, I just eliminated the compiler from ge
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Michael Meissner
wrote:
> This bug fixes PR 68404, which created an insn for the fusion operation when
> accessing an array with a large constant offset that the downstream passes
> (regrenam in particular don't like). Because fusion in general adds so little
> to
