Re: [PATCH], V7, #5 of 7, Add more effective targets for the 'future' system to target-supports.

2019-12-03 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 01:11:55PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 08:11:16PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 05:56:50PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > > > * lib/target-supports.exp > > > (check_effective_target_powerpc_future_ok): Do not

Re: [PATCH], V7, #5 of 7, Add more effective targets for the 'future' system to target-supports.

2019-12-03 Thread Michael Meissner
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 08:11:16PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 05:56:50PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > > * lib/target-supports.exp > > (check_effective_target_powerpc_future_ok): Do not require 64-bit > > or Linux support before doing the test. Use a

Re: [PATCH], V7, #5 of 7, Add more effective targets for the 'future' system to target-supports.

2019-11-22 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 05:56:50PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > * lib/target-supports.exp > (check_effective_target_powerpc_future_ok): Do not require 64-bit > or Linux support before doing the test. Use a 32-bit constant in > PLI. You changed from 0x12345 to 0x1234,

[PATCH], V7, #5 of 7, Add more effective targets for the 'future' system to target-supports.

2019-11-14 Thread Michael Meissner
This patch adds more effective targets to the target-supports.exp in the testsuite. I tried to break it down to whether prefixed instructions are allowed, whether the target is generating 64-bit code with prefixed instructions, and if -mpcrel support is available. I also enabled 'future' testing