On Fri, 19 Aug 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> >
> > This is the fix for the testcase in PR50067. We strip outermost
> > (yes, outermost only, which makes it very inefficient) MEM_REFs
> > which causes the DR base objects in the PR to agree for t
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> This is the fix for the testcase in PR50067. We strip outermost
> (yes, outermost only, which makes it very inefficient) MEM_REFs
> which causes the DR base objects in the PR to agree for two
> conflicting DRs, but with the issues we have with how
This is the fix for the testcase in PR50067. We strip outermost
(yes, outermost only, which makes it very inefficient) MEM_REFs
which causes the DR base objects in the PR to agree for two
conflicting DRs, but with the issues we have with how we
compose access functions they still get disambiguate
