Looks good.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> The following fixes a GC issue I run into when doing
>> prune_unused_types_prune early. The issue is that the DIE struct
>> has a chain_circular marked field (die_si
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> The following fixes a GC issue I run into when doing
> prune_unused_types_prune early. The issue is that the DIE struct
> has a chain_circular marked field (die_sib) which cannot tolerate
> spurious extra entries from old removed entries
The following fixes a GC issue I run into when doing
prune_unused_types_prune early. The issue is that the DIE struct
has a chain_circular marked field (die_sib) which cannot tolerate
spurious extra entries from old removed entries into the circular
chain. Otherwise we fail to properly mark par