On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:35:38PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For the testcase in this patch where the value of x is zero we currently
> generate:
> foo:
> mov w1, 4
> .L2:
> ldaxr w2, [x0]
> cmp w2, 0
> bne .L3
> stxrw3, w1
Ping.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 08/05/17 12:00, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Ping.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 24/04/17 10:38, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Pinging this back into context so that I don't forget about it...
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg00376.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 08/03/17 16:35, Kyrill T
Ping.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 24/04/17 10:38, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Pinging this back into context so that I don't forget about it...
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg00376.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 08/03/17 16:35, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
For the testcase in this patch where the
Pinging this back into context so that I don't forget about it...
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg00376.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 08/03/17 16:35, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
For the testcase in this patch where the value of x is zero we currently
generate:
foo:
mov w
Hi all,
For the testcase in this patch where the value of x is zero we currently
generate:
foo:
mov w1, 4
.L2:
ldaxr w2, [x0]
cmp w2, 0
bne .L3
stxrw3, w1, [x0]
cbnzw3, .L2
.L3:
csetw0, eq
ret
We currently