This patch fixes a failure in gcc.target/aarch64/reload-valid-spoff.c
triggered by https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg01367.html -
it supersedes https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg01907.html
as this fixes the root cause of the failure.
In ILP32 all memory accesses must have
On 27/06/17 14:39, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> This patch fixes a failure in gcc.target/aarch64/reload-valid-spoff.c
> triggered by https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg01367.html -
> it supersedes https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg01907.html
> as this fixes the root cause of the
On Jun 27 2017, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> @@ -5207,6 +5209,7 @@ aarch64_print_operand (FILE *f, rtx x, int code)
>
> case MEM:
> output_address (GET_MODE (x), XEXP (x, 0));
> + gcc_assert (GET_MODE (XEXP (x, 0)) == Pmode);
> break;
>
> case CONST:
That breaks
Andreas Schwab wrote:
> @@ -5207,6 +5209,7 @@ aarch64_print_operand (FILE *f, rtx x, int code)
>
> case MEM:
> output_address (GET_MODE (x), XEXP (x, 0));
> + gcc_assert (GET_MODE (XEXP (x, 0)) == Pmode);
> break;
>
> case CONST:
> That breaks a lot of gna
On Jul 04 2017, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> checking whether compiler driver understands Ada... no
You need to fix that first.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 12:19:35PM +, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > @@ -5207,6 +5209,7 @@ aarch64_print_operand (FILE *f, rtx x, int code)
> >
> > case MEM:
> > output_address (GET_MODE (x), XEXP (x, 0));
> > + gcc_assert (GET_MODE (XEXP (x, 0)) == Pm
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 12:19:35PM +, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
>> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> > @@ -5207,6 +5209,7 @@ aarch64_print_operand (FILE *f, rtx x, int code)
>> >
>> >case MEM:
>> > output_address (GET_MODE (x), XEXP (
Hi,
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> Yeah it turns out that on the machine Wilco was using, we are running
> 14.04 which has a gcc 4.8 base compiler that didn't have Ada on for
> AArch64.
>
> I think we can work around by installing a gcc-5 package and then
> setting CC to gc
Michael Matz wrote:
>
> You'll probably also have to set GNATBIND and GNATMAKE to the
> appropriately suffixed variants. Just saying, because that's what I'm
> usually forgetting and end up with strange errors :)
Configure seems to be able to find gnatbind/gnatmake as they are in /usr/bin.
Com
Hi,
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> > You'll probably also have to set GNATBIND and GNATMAKE to the
> > appropriately suffixed variants. Just saying, because that's what I'm
> > usually forgetting and end up with strange errors :)
>
> Configure seems to be able to find gnatbind/gn
On Jul 04 2017, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> Configure seems to be able to find gnatbind/gnatmake as they are in /usr/bin.
Strange there are ada tools, but no ada compiler. Are you sure you
installed all relevant ada packages?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2017, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
>
>> > You'll probably also have to set GNATBIND and GNATMAKE to the
>> > appropriately suffixed variants. Just saying, because that's what I'm
>> > usually forgetting and end up with strange e
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> This patch fixes a failure in gcc.target/aarch64/reload-valid-spoff.c
> triggered by https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg01367.html -
> it supersedes https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg01907.html
> as this fixes the root
Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> This looks related to PR 80266 in that one was crashing due to the
> store pair instruction like what was reported.
Yes it's the same bug. I've now finally reproduced it, it seems many stack
addresses in Ada are SImode which is incorrect (and ultimately can trigger
the LD
14 matches
Mail list logo
