On 30/06/14 11:44, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 30 June 2014 10:41, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Here it is.
Now it applies cleanly to 4.9 and the tests are in gcc.target/aarch64
instead of gcc.target/aarch64/simd
Tested on aarch64-none-elf and aarch64_be-none-elf.
Ok to apply?
OK, thanks.
/Marcus
On 30 June 2014 10:41, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> Here it is.
> Now it applies cleanly to 4.9 and the tests are in gcc.target/aarch64
> instead of gcc.target/aarch64/simd
>
> Tested on aarch64-none-elf and aarch64_be-none-elf.
>
> Ok to apply?
OK, thanks.
/Marcus
On 23/06/14 11:52, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 23/06/14 09:26, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 20 June 2014 15:14, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Sure, but it depends on
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg00779.html.
Is it ok to backport that one as well?
This can be backported as well.
/Marcus
On 23/06/14 09:26, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 20 June 2014 15:14, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Sure, but it depends on
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg00779.html.
Is it ok to backport that one as well?
This can be backported as well.
/Marcus
Thanks, I've backported to 4.9 the above
On 20 June 2014 15:14, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Sure, but it depends on
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg00779.html.
> Is it ok to backport that one as well?
This can be backported as well.
/Marcus
On 20/06/14 09:41, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 16 June 2014 15:26, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed that a few saturating math intrinsics in arm_neon.h for aarch64
have the wrong types, i.e. not what's mandated by the ACLE spec.
This patch fixes that by adjusting the types of the built
On 16 June 2014 15:26, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that a few saturating math intrinsics in arm_neon.h for aarch64
> have the wrong types, i.e. not what's mandated by the ACLE spec.
>
> This patch fixes that by adjusting the types of the builtin functions that
> those intrinsics
