On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Some early revisions of the Cortex-A53 have an erratum (835769) whereby
> it is possible for a 64-bit multiply-accumulate instruction in
> AArch64 state to generate an incorrect result. The details are quite
> complex and hard
On 10/10/14 15:22, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> On 10/10/14 15:18, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> On 10/10/14 11:53, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>> Some early revisions of the Cortex-A53 have an erratum (835769) whereby
>>> it is possible for a 64-bit multiply-accumulate instruction in
>>>
On 10/10/14 15:18, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 10/10/14 11:53, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
Some early revisions of the Cortex-A53 have an erratum (835769) whereby
it is possible for a 64-bit multiply-accumulate instruction in
AArch64 state to generate an incorrect result. The details are qu
On 10/10/14 11:53, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Some early revisions of the Cortex-A53 have an erratum (835769) whereby
> it is possible for a 64-bit multiply-accumulate instruction in
> AArch64 state to generate an incorrect result. The details are quite
> complex and hard to determine
On 10 October 2014 11:53, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Some early revisions of the Cortex-A53 have an erratum (835769) whereby
> it is possible for a 64-bit multiply-accumulate instruction in
> AArch64 state to generate an incorrect result. The details are quite
> complex and hard to det
Hi all,
Some early revisions of the Cortex-A53 have an erratum (835769) whereby
it is possible for a 64-bit multiply-accumulate instruction in
AArch64 state to generate an incorrect result. The details are quite
complex and hard to determine statically, since branches in the code
may exist in s
