On 24/05/16 14:25, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The int_log2 function in arm.c is not really useful since we already have a
> generic function for calculating
> the log2 of HOST_WIDE_INTs. The only difference in functionality is that
> int_log2 also asserts that the result
> is no greater
Ping.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 16/06/16 10:31, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Ping.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 09/06/16 12:04, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00139.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 02/06/16 11:37, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
I wanted to ping this patch, but checking the
Ping.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 09/06/16 12:04, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00139.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 02/06/16 11:37, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
I wanted to ping this patch, but checking the gcc-patches archive I see this
wasn't
archived, though I have co
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00139.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 02/06/16 11:37, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
I wanted to ping this patch, but checking the gcc-patches archive I see this
wasn't
archived, though I have confirmed that the patch was sent out and distributed by
the mail s
I wanted to ping this patch, but checking the gcc-patches archive I see this
wasn't
archived, though I have confirmed that the patch was sent out and distributed by
the mail server correctly.
Anyway, resending...
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 24/05/16 14:25, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
The int_log2 fu
Hi all,
The int_log2 function in arm.c is not really useful since we already have a
generic function for calculating
the log2 of HOST_WIDE_INTs. The only difference in functionality is that
int_log2 also asserts that the result
is no greater than 31.
This patch removes int_log2 in favour of ex
