On 31 March 2016 at 18:26, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> On 30/03/16 09:34, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 29/03/16 19:46, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16 March 2016 at 16:54, Ramana Radhakrishnan
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
>
> H
On 30/03/16 09:34, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 29/03/16 19:46, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 16 March 2016 at 16:54, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Hi all,
This is the GCC 4.9 backport of
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01338.htm
On 29/03/16 19:46, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 16 March 2016 at 16:54, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Hi all,
This is the GCC 4.9 backport of
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01338.html.
The differences are that TARGET_HAVE_LPA
On 16 March 2016 at 16:54, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is the GCC 4.9 backport of
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01338.html.
>> The differences are that TARGET_HAVE_LPAE has to be defined in arm.h
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is the GCC 4.9 backport of
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01338.html.
> The differences are that TARGET_HAVE_LPAE has to be defined in arm.h in a
> different way because
> the ARM_FSET_HAS_CPU1 mechanism do
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01627.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 24/02/16 11:23, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This is the GCC 4.9 backport of
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01338.html.
The differences are that TARGET_HAVE_LPAE has to be defined in arm.h in a
di
Hi all,
This is the GCC 4.9 backport of
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01338.html.
The differences are that TARGET_HAVE_LPAE has to be defined in arm.h in a
different way because
the ARM_FSET_HAS_CPU1 mechanism doesn't exist on this branch. Also, due to the
location of insn_flag
