On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
> Hi Han,
>
> On 21/01/16 22:57, Han Shen wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kyrill, the patched gcc generates correct asm for me for the test
>> case. (I'll then build the whole system to see if other it-block
>> related bugs are gone too.)
>>
>> One short que
Hi Han,
On 21/01/16 22:57, Han Shen wrote:
Hi Kyrill, the patched gcc generates correct asm for me for the test
case. (I'll then build the whole system to see if other it-block
related bugs are gone too.)
One short question, the newly generated RTL for
x = x |(a)
will be
orr %0,
Hi Kyrill, the patched gcc generates correct asm for me for the test
case. (I'll then build the whole system to see if other it-block
related bugs are gone too.)
One short question, the newly generated RTL for
x = x |(a)
will be
orr %0, %1, #1; it ; mov%D2\\t%0, %1 (b)
The cond in (a
Hi all,
In this wrong-code PR the pattern for performing
x = x | for -mrestrict-it is buggy and ends up writing 1 to the
result register rather than orring it.
The offending pattern is *thumb2_ior_scc_strict_it.
My proposed solution is to rewrite it as a splitter, remove the
alternative for the
