On 27 November 2014 at 11:35, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com wrote:
On 26/08/14 13:36, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 29/07/14 15:49, Jiong Wang wrote:
test done
===
no regression on the full toolchain test
On 01/12/14 15:33, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 27 November 2014 at 11:35, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com wrote:
On 26/08/14 13:36, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 29/07/14 15:49, Jiong Wang wrote:
test done
===
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com wrote:
On 26/08/14 13:36, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 29/07/14 15:49, Jiong Wang wrote:
test done
===
no regression on the full toolchain test on arm-none-eabi.
ok to install?
Hmm, I think this is wrong for DF mode. The
On 26/08/14 13:36, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 29/07/14 15:49, Jiong Wang wrote:
test done
===
no regression on the full toolchain test on arm-none-eabi.
ok to install?
Hmm, I think this is wrong for DF mode. The principle the patch works
on is by tying the output to the value containing
On 29/07/14 15:49, Jiong Wang wrote:
this patch optimize copysign/copysignf for -mfloat-abi=soft on arm when BFI
instruction is available.
before this patch, we do copysign (a, b) by three steps:
* fetch the sign bit of b to A
* fetch all non-sign bits of a to B
* or A and B
this patch optimize copysign/copysignf for -mfloat-abi=soft on arm when BFI
instruction is available.
before this patch, we do copysign (a, b) by three steps:
* fetch the sign bit of b to A
* fetch all non-sign bits of a to B
* or A and B
while these three steps could be finished by one
