On 02/18/2017 09:48 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Let me know whether this looks fine to you, and I'll commit.
>
> Gerald
I'm fine with that! Thanks.
Martin
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Yes, but...
>> (I'm still not quite sure what this option does, and whether we
>> could say "poison and unpoison it", for example? Can you advise?)
> I'm sending enhancement of that. Basically: direct poisoning = emitting
> instructions that touch shado
On 02/03/2017 10:45 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Installed as obvious as r245147.
>
> Yes, but...
Hi.
Thanks for that, stupid typos.
>
> I think you wanted to say "is 256", not "in 256" and make this a
> full sentence? Looking at the entire entry I no
On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Martin Liška wrote:
> Installed as obvious as r245147.
Yes, but...
I think you wanted to say "is 256", not "in 256" and make this a
full sentence? Looking at the entire entry I noticed a few other
issues ("smaller of equal" instead of "smaller or equal", missing
articles, pas
Hello.
Installed as obvious as r245147.
Martin
>From 705314a0d896e5434dcb30b6e5790fc5dab132b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:07:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Document default value for
use-after-scope-direct-emission-threshold
gcc/ChangeLog:
2017-02-03 Martin Lisk
