On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 2:22 PM Andre Vieira (lists)
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The code change that caused this regression was not meant to affect neon
> code-gen, however I missed the REG fall through. This patch makes sure
> we only get the left-hand of the PLUS if it is indeed a PLUS expr.
>
> I sugg
> -Original Message-
> From: Andre Vieira (lists)
> Sent: 27 April 2020 14:22
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov
> Subject: [PATCH][GCC][Arm]: Fix bootstrap failure with rtl-checking
>
> Hi,
>
> The code change that caused this regressio
Hi,
The code change that caused this regression was not meant to affect neon
code-gen, however I missed the REG fall through. This patch makes sure
we only get the left-hand of the PLUS if it is indeed a PLUS expr.
I suggest that in gcc-11 this code is cleaned up, as I do not think we
even
