Re: [PATCH][GCC11] PR tree-optimization/103603 - Directly resolve range_of_stmt dependencies. (Port of PR 103231/103464)

On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 6:40 PM Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches wrote: > > On 12/7/21 15:19, Andrew MacLeod wrote: > > The following patch is a slight rework of the 2 patches which flatten > > rangers call stack. It needed some tweaking since some of the > > routines have changed name or been adjus

Re: [PATCH][GCC11] PR tree-optimization/103603 - Directly resolve range_of_stmt dependencies. (Port of PR 103231/103464)

On 12/7/21 15:19, Andrew MacLeod wrote: The following patch is a slight rework of the 2 patches which flatten rangers call stack.  It needed some tweaking since some of the routines have changed name or been adjusted. This has been bootstrapped on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with no regressions.  OK

Re: [PATCH][GCC11] PR tree-optimization/103603 - Directly resolve range_of_stmt dependencies. (Port of PR 103231/103464)

Test result from RISC-V, tested on riscv64-unknown-elf and riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu with no regressions. Thanks :) On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 4:19 AM Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches wrote: > > The following patch is a slight rework of the 2 patches which flatten > rangers call stack. It needed some

[PATCH][GCC11] PR tree-optimization/103603 - Directly resolve range_of_stmt dependencies. (Port of PR 103231/103464)

The following patch is a slight rework of the 2 patches which flatten rangers call stack.  It needed some tweaking since some of the routines have changed name or been adjusted. This has been bootstrapped on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with no regressions.  OK for gcc-11 release branch? Andrew comm