On 21-04-15 09:50, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Mark ifn_va_arg with ECF_NOTHROW
You can definitely make it ECF_LEAF too. I wonder if we can make it ECF_CONST
or at leat PURE
this would help to keep variadic functions const/pure that may be moderately
intere
On 24-04-15 05:25, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes PR65802.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/
pr65802.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr65802.C
new file mode 100644
index 000..26e5317
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr65802.C
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch fixes PR65802.
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/
pr65802.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr65802.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..26e5317
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr65802.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +//
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Mark ifn_va_arg with ECF_NOTHROW
>
> You can defnitly make it ECF_LEAF too. I wonder if we can make it ECF_CONST
> or at leat PURE
> this would help to keep variadic functions const/pure that may be moderately
> interesting
> in practice.
Yes to ECF_
> Mark ifn_va_arg with ECF_NOTHROW
You can defnitly make it ECF_LEAF too. I wonder if we can make it ECF_CONST or
at leat PURE
this would help to keep variadic functions const/pure that may be moderately
interesting
in practice.
Honza
>
> 2015-04-20 Tom de Vries
>
> PR tree-optimizat
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch fixes PR65802.
>
> The problem described in PR65802 is that when compiling the test-case
> (included in the patch below) at -O0, the compiler runs into a gcc_assert ICE
> in redirect_eh_edge_1 during pass_cleanup_eh:
> ...
> g
Hi,
this patch fixes PR65802.
The problem described in PR65802 is that when compiling the test-case (included
in the patch below) at -O0, the compiler runs into a gcc_assert ICE in
redirect_eh_edge_1 during pass_cleanup_eh:
...
gcc_assert (lookup_stmt_eh_lp (throw_stmt) == old_lp_nr
