On 11/16/20 5:40 AM, Jonathan Yong wrote:
On 11/14/20 12:29 PM, Liu Hao via Gcc-patches wrote:
This is the third revision of my patch:
1. Two typos in the commit message have been fixed.
2. Support for `%a` and `%A` has been added. Documentation can be
found on the same page in the commit m
On 11/14/20 12:29 PM, Liu Hao via Gcc-patches wrote:
This is the third revision of my patch:
1. Two typos in the commit message have been fixed.
2. Support for `%a` and `%A` has been added. Documentation can be
found on the same page in the commit message.
3. GCC will no longer warn about 'I
This is the third revision of my patch:
1. Two typos in the commit message have been fixed.
2. Support for `%a` and `%A` has been added. Documentation can be
found on the same page in the commit message.
3. GCC will no longer warn about 'ISO C does not support the ‘L’
ms_printf length modifi
在 2020/11/14 上午8:12, Joseph Myers 写道:
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020, Liu Hao via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
>> 在 2020/11/13 2:46, Joseph Myers 写道:
>>> I'd expect these patches to include updates to the gcc.dg/format/ms_*.c
>>> tests to reflect the changed semantics (or new tests there if some of the
>>> chang
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020, Liu Hao via Gcc-patches wrote:
> 在 2020/11/13 2:46, Joseph Myers 写道:
> > I'd expect these patches to include updates to the gcc.dg/format/ms_*.c
> > tests to reflect the changed semantics (or new tests there if some of the
> > changes don't result in any failures in the exis
在 2020/11/13 2:46, Joseph Myers 写道:
> I'd expect these patches to include updates to the gcc.dg/format/ms_*.c
> tests to reflect the changed semantics (or new tests there if some of the
> changes don't result in any failures in the existing tests).
>
Does the attached patch suffice?
I know ver
I'd expect these patches to include updates to the gcc.dg/format/ms_*.c
tests to reflect the changed semantics (or new tests there if some of the
changes don't result in any failures in the existing tests).
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
在 2020/11/12 23:12, Liu Hao 写道:
>
> My humble opinion is that people should have gotten used to the `ll`
> specifier so I propose a
> different patch that enables it unconditionally. As Jonathan Yong pointed
> out, GCC is impossible to
The previous patch missed a `double_name` field. A revised
在 2020/11/12 18:18, Jonathan Yong 写道:
> libgomp build fails because of the false -Wformat error, even though:
> 1. Correct C99 inttypes.h macros are used.
> 2. __mingw_* C99 wrappers are used.
> 3. The printf attribute is used, but it was aliased to ms_printf
>
> The attached patch makes mingw-w64
libgomp build fails because of the false -Wformat error, even though:
1. Correct C99 inttypes.h macros are used.
2. __mingw_* C99 wrappers are used.
3. The printf attribute is used, but it was aliased to ms_printf
The attached patch makes mingw-w64 printf attribute equivalent to other
platforms
10 matches
Mail list logo
