On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 2:30 AM Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2023, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 2:54?AM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > The following makes sure that FP x > y ? x : y style max/min operations
> > > are if-converted at the
On Fri, 14 Jul 2023, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 2:54?AM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > The following makes sure that FP x > y ? x : y style max/min operations
> > are if-converted at the GIMPLE level. While we can neither match
> > it to MAX_EXPR nor .FMAX
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 2:54 AM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> The following makes sure that FP x > y ? x : y style max/min operations
> are if-converted at the GIMPLE level. While we can neither match
> it to MAX_EXPR nor .FMAX as both have different semantics with IEEE
> than the
The following makes sure that FP x > y ? x : y style max/min operations
are if-converted at the GIMPLE level. While we can neither match
it to MAX_EXPR nor .FMAX as both have different semantics with IEEE
than the ternary ?: operation we can make sure to maintain this form
as a COND_EXPR so
