On 08/04/2015 02:44 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 03/08/15 18:37, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Looking at the x86 movcc expansion code (ix86_expand_int_movcc) I
don't think this is a good idea. In the expander, there is already
quite some target-dep
On 10/08/15 10:43, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
I'm testing a patch that fix the testcases on x86_64 and does not
harm codegen on aarch64. Feel free to file a PR and assign it to me.
PR67103 [1]
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
I'm testing a patch that fix the testcases on x86_64 and does not
harm codegen on aarch64. Feel free to file a PR and assign it to me.
>>>
>>> PR67103 [1]
>>>
>>> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67103
>>
>> Thanks,
On 04/08/15 09:44, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 03/08/15 18:37, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Looking at the x86 movcc expansion code (ix86_expand_int_movcc) I
don't think this is a good idea. In the expander, there is already
quite some target-dependen
On 03/08/15 18:37, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Looking at the x86 movcc expansion code (ix86_expand_int_movcc) I
don't think this is a good idea. In the expander, there is already
quite some target-dependent code that goes great length to utilize s
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Looking at the x86 movcc expansion code (ix86_expand_int_movcc) I
> don't think this is a good idea. In the expander, there is already
> quite some target-dependent code that goes great length to utilize sbb
> insn as much as
On 03/08/15 16:53, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 03/08/15 16:45, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Looking at the x86 movcc expansion code (ix86_expand_int_movcc) I
don't think this is a good idea. In the expander, there is already
quite some target-dependen
On 08/03/2015 09:50 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
The original code looks better, tree height is just 2 and therefore it
can be executed in 2 cycles. New code has more dependencies and tree
height becomes 5. It is always hard to say for all x86 targets but as
a generic code the original version is b
On 03/08/15 16:45, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Looking at the x86 movcc expansion code (ix86_expand_int_movcc) I
don't think this is a good idea. In the expander, there is already
quite some target-dependent code that goes great length to utilize s
2015-08-03 17:04 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>
>> On 03/08/15 13:33, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
2015-07-30 Kyrylo Tkachov
* ifcvt.c (noce_try_store_flag_constants): Make logic of the case
when diff ==
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>> Looking at the x86 movcc expansion code (ix86_expand_int_movcc) I
>> don't think this is a good idea. In the expander, there is already
>> quite some target-dependent code that goes great length to utilize sbb
>> insn as much as possible, b
On 03/08/15 15:15, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 03/08/15 14:37, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
On 03/08/15 13:33, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
2015-07-30 Kyrylo Tkachov
* ifcvt.c (noce_try_st
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>
>> On 03/08/15 13:33, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
2015-07-30 Kyrylo Tkachov
* ifcvt.c (noce_try_store_flag_constants): Make logic of the case
wh
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> On 03/08/15 14:37, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Kyrill Tkachov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/08/15 13:33, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
> 2015-07-30 Kyrylo Tkachov
>
> * ifcvt.c (noce_t
On 03/08/15 14:43, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 03/08/15 14:37, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 03/08/15 13:33, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
2015-07-30 Kyrylo Tkachov
* ifcvt.c (noce_try_store_flag_constants): Make logic of the case
wh
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> On 03/08/15 13:33, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>>> 2015-07-30 Kyrylo Tkachov
>>>
>>> * ifcvt.c (noce_try_store_flag_constants): Make logic of the case
>>> when diff == STORE_FLAG_VALUE or diff == -STORE_FLAG_VALUE more
>
On 03/08/15 14:37, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 03/08/15 13:33, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
2015-07-30 Kyrylo Tkachov
* ifcvt.c (noce_try_store_flag_constants): Make logic of the case
when diff == STORE_FLAG_VALUE or diff == -STOR
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> On 03/08/15 13:33, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>>> 2015-07-30 Kyrylo Tkachov
>>>
>>> * ifcvt.c (noce_try_store_flag_constants): Make logic of the case
>>> when diff == STORE_FLAG_VALUE or diff == -STORE_FLAG_VALUE more
>
On 03/08/15 13:33, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
2015-07-30 Kyrylo Tkachov
* ifcvt.c (noce_try_store_flag_constants): Make logic of the case
when diff == STORE_FLAG_VALUE or diff == -STORE_FLAG_VALUE more
explicit. Prefer to add the flag whenever possible.
(noce_process_if
Hello!
> 2015-07-30 Kyrylo Tkachov
>
> * ifcvt.c (noce_try_store_flag_constants): Make logic of the case
> when diff == STORE_FLAG_VALUE or diff == -STORE_FLAG_VALUE more
> explicit. Prefer to add the flag whenever possible.
> (noce_process_if_block): Try noce_try_store_flag_co
On 07/30/2015 07:42 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Jeff,
On 29/07/15 23:38, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/29/2015 07:49 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This patch improves RTL if-conversion on sequences that perform a
conditional select on integer constants.
Most of the smart logic to do that already
Hi Jeff,
On 29/07/15 23:38, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/29/2015 07:49 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This patch improves RTL if-conversion on sequences that perform a
conditional select on integer constants.
Most of the smart logic to do that already exists in the
noce_try_store_flag_constants fu
On 07/29/2015 07:49 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This patch improves RTL if-conversion on sequences that perform a
conditional select on integer constants.
Most of the smart logic to do that already exists in the
noce_try_store_flag_constants function.
However, currently that function is tr
Hi all,
This patch improves RTL if-conversion on sequences that perform a conditional
select on integer constants.
Most of the smart logic to do that already exists in the
noce_try_store_flag_constants function.
However, currently that function is tried after noce_try_cmove.
noce_try_cmove is a
24 matches
Mail list logo
