On 27/11/19 06:37 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
On 11/26/19 10:52 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/11/19 20:07 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
Sure, I am about to do so.
However I wasn't sure about this syntax before the commit so I had
run the new 2_neg.cc with:
make CXXFLAGS=-std=c++98 chec
On 11/26/19 10:52 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/11/19 20:07 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
Sure, I am about to do so.
However I wasn't sure about this syntax before the commit so I had
run the new 2_neg.cc with:
make CXXFLAGS=-std=c++98 check-debug
and it worked fine and still is !
The
On 26/11/19 20:07 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
On 11/26/19 1:21 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/11/19 12:33 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 22/11/2019 18:59, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 22/11/19 18:38 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
I noticed that we are not checking that iterators are not
On 11/26/19 9:49 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 26/11/2019 20:07, François Dumont wrote:
However I wasn't sure about this syntax before the commit so I had
run the new 2_neg.cc with:
make CXXFLAGS=-std=c++98 check-debug
and it worked fine and still is !
I also try -std=gnu++98 and made sure
On 26/11/2019 20:07, François Dumont wrote:
However I wasn't sure about this syntax before the commit so I had run
the new 2_neg.cc with:
make CXXFLAGS=-std=c++98 check-debug
and it worked fine and still is !
I also try -std=gnu++98 and made sure that pch had been updated by
re-building libs
On 11/26/19 1:21 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/11/19 12:33 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 22/11/2019 18:59, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 22/11/19 18:38 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
I noticed that we are not checking that iterators are not
singular in valid_range. Moreover __check_singu
On 26/11/19 12:33 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 22/11/2019 18:59, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 22/11/19 18:38 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
I noticed that we are not checking that iterators are not
singular in valid_range. Moreover __check_singular signature for
pointers is not intercepti
On 22/11/2019 18:59, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 22/11/19 18:38 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
I noticed that we are not checking that iterators are not singular
in valid_range. Moreover __check_singular signature for pointers is
not intercepting all kind of pointers in terms of qualification.
On 22/11/19 18:38 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
I noticed that we are not checking that iterators are not singular
in valid_range. Moreover __check_singular signature for pointers is
not intercepting all kind of pointers in terms of qualification.
I'd like to commit it next week b
Hi
I noticed that we are not checking that iterators are not singular
in valid_range. Moreover __check_singular signature for pointers is not
intercepting all kind of pointers in terms of qualification.
I'd like to commit it next week but considering we are in stage 3 I
need proper a
10 matches
Mail list logo