On 23 Sep 12:26, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 08:09:04PM +0400, Michael V. Zolotukhin wrote:
> > Hi Jakub,
> >
> > Updated patch and my answers are below.
>
> Ok for gomp-4_0-branch.
Checked into gomp-4_0-branch by Kirill Yukhin:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2013-09/msg00692.h
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 08:09:04PM +0400, Michael V. Zolotukhin wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> Updated patch and my answers are below.
Ok for gomp-4_0-branch.
Jakub
Hi Jakub,
Updated patch and my answers are below.
> The OpenMP standard has the omp_is_initial_device () function that can be
> used to query whether the code is offloaded or not. So I don't think we
> need to do the logging. For the device 257 hack we of course don't return
> that as true, but
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:35:38PM +0400, Michael V. Zolotukhin wrote:
> I merged my patch with recent changes in gomp4-branch, and the new version is
> below. Also, I fixed most of your remarks - the one isn't fixed is checking
> sizeof(void*)==sizeof(uintptr_t) in configure. I'll do it in the n
Hi Jakub,
I merged my patch with recent changes in gomp4-branch, and the new version is
below. Also, I fixed most of your remarks - the one isn't fixed is checking
sizeof(void*)==sizeof(uintptr_t) in configure. I'll do it in the next patch.
Is it ok for gomp4-branch?
Also, I was thinking of ho
