Re: [PATCH][testsuite] Abort on failure in gcc.dg/pr30957-1.c

2015-02-22 Thread Tom de Vries
On 20-02-15 20:18, Mike Stump wrote: On Feb 20, 2015, at 4:36 AM, Tom de Vries wrote: On 20-02-15 10:42, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:25:54AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: this patch reverses the abort logic in pr30957-1.c, such that it aborts on failure rather than on success

Re: [PATCH][testsuite] Abort on failure in gcc.dg/pr30957-1.c

2015-02-20 Thread Mike Stump
On Feb 20, 2015, at 10:12 AM, Mike Stump wrote: > On Feb 20, 2015, at 1:42 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:25:54AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: >>> this patch reverses the abort logic in pr30957-1.c, such that it aborts on >>> failure rather than on success. >> >> That sound

Re: [PATCH][testsuite] Abort on failure in gcc.dg/pr30957-1.c

2015-02-20 Thread Mike Stump
On Feb 20, 2015, at 4:36 AM, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 20-02-15 10:42, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:25:54AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: >>> this patch reverses the abort logic in pr30957-1.c, such that it aborts on >>> failure rather than on success. >> >> That sounds really w

Re: [PATCH][testsuite] Abort on failure in gcc.dg/pr30957-1.c

2015-02-20 Thread Mike Stump
On Feb 20, 2015, at 1:42 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:25:54AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: >> this patch reverses the abort logic in pr30957-1.c, such that it aborts on >> failure rather than on success. > > That sounds really weird. From the description it looks like it i

Re: [PATCH][testsuite] Abort on failure in gcc.dg/pr30957-1.c

2015-02-20 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:36:15PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 20-02-15 10:42, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:25:54AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: > >>this patch reverses the abort logic in pr30957-1.c, such that it aborts on > >>failure rather than on success. > > > >That sou

Re: [PATCH][testsuite] Abort on failure in gcc.dg/pr30957-1.c

2015-02-20 Thread Tom de Vries
On 20-02-15 10:42, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:25:54AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: this patch reverses the abort logic in pr30957-1.c, such that it aborts on failure rather than on success. That sounds really weird. From the description it looks like it is a known bug that

Re: [PATCH][testsuite] Abort on failure in gcc.dg/pr30957-1.c

2015-02-20 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:25:54AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: > this patch reverses the abort logic in pr30957-1.c, such that it aborts on > failure rather than on success. That sounds really weird. From the description it looks like it is a known bug that we don't return -0.0. If 0.0 is the righ

[PATCH][testsuite] Abort on failure in gcc.dg/pr30957-1.c

2015-02-20 Thread Tom de Vries
Hi, this patch reverses the abort logic in pr30957-1.c, such that it aborts on failure rather than on success. OK for stage4? Thanks, - Tom 2015-02-20 Tom de Vries * gcc.dg/pr30957-1.c (main): Abort on failure. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr30957-1.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 i