On 17 November 2014 11:42, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Makes sense. Here are the changes for the 4.9 and 4.8 changes.html pages.
>
> Ok?
This looks ok to me, I'd suggest changing...
+ Starting with GCC 4.8.4 a workaround for the ARM Cortex-A53
to
+ As of GCC 4.8.4
OK with that change.
/
On 14/11/14 15:31, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Friday 2014-11-14 15:06, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Considering that the erratum workaround option was backported to 4.8,
I assume we'll need an item for that in the changes.html for that
branch?
Good point.
Yes. It will be good note note which minor re
On Friday 2014-11-14 15:06, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Considering that the erratum workaround option was backported to 4.8,
> I assume we'll need an item for that in the changes.html for that
> branch?
Good point.
Yes. It will be good note note which minor release is the first
with this fix, tho
Hi all,
Considering that the erratum workaround option was backported to 4.8, I
assume we'll need an item for that
in the changes.html for that branch?
The text is the same as in the trunk version that I committed recently.
Ok?
Thanks,
KyrillIndex: htdocs/gcc-4.8/changes.html
