On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 05:43:48PM +0800, Hongtao Liu via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi:
> The issue is described in the bugzilla.
> Bootstrap is ok, regression test for i386/x86-64 backend is ok.
> Ok for trunk?
>
> ChangeLog
> gcc/
> PR target/96551
> * config/i386/sse.md (vec_unp
ping ^2
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 7:37 PM Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> ping^1
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:43 PM Hongtao Liu wrote:
> >
> > Hi:
> > The issue is described in the bugzilla.
> > Bootstrap is ok, regression test for i386/x86-64 backend is ok.
> > Ok for trunk?
> >
> > ChangeLog
> > gc
ping^1
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:43 PM Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> Hi:
> The issue is described in the bugzilla.
> Bootstrap is ok, regression test for i386/x86-64 backend is ok.
> Ok for trunk?
>
> ChangeLog
> gcc/
> PR target/96551
> * config/i386/sse.md (vec_unpacku_float_hi_v1
Hi:
The issue is described in the bugzilla.
Bootstrap is ok, regression test for i386/x86-64 backend is ok.
Ok for trunk?
ChangeLog
gcc/
PR target/96551
* config/i386/sse.md (vec_unpacku_float_hi_v16si): For vector
compare to integer mask, don't use gen_rtx_LT , use
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 11:02 PM Kirill Yukhin wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On 05 авг 09:29, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 6:28 PM Kirill Yukhin
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 04 авг 13:26, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > > > Could you please clarify, how your patch relared to [1]?
> > > > I see fro
Hello,
On 05 авг 09:29, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 6:28 PM Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> >
> > On 04 авг 13:26, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > > Could you please clarify, how your patch relared to [1]?
> > > I see from the bug that it describes perf issue w.r.t. scalar
> > > operations.
> >
>
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 6:28 PM Kirill Yukhin wrote:
>
> On 04 авг 13:26, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > Could you please clarify, how your patch relared to [1]?
> > I see from the bug that it describes perf issue w.r.t. scalar
> > operations.
>
Sorry for Typo, it's pr96243.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
On 04 авг 13:26, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Could you please clarify, how your patch relared to [1]?
> I see from the bug that it describes perf issue w.r.t. scalar
> operations.
[1] - https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96226
>
> --
> Regards, Kirill Yukhin
Hello,
On 20 июл 13:46, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> Hi:
> For rtx like (eq:HI (V8SI 90) (V8SI 91)), cse will take it as a
> boolean value and try to do some optimization. But it is not true for
> vector compare, also other places in rtl passes hold the same
> assumption.
>
> Bootstrap is ok, regressio
ping^2
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 5:31 PM Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> ping
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 4:40 PM Hongtao Liu wrote:
> >
> > Correct PR number in ChangeLog
> > it's pr96243.
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 1:46 PM Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi:
> > > For rtx like (eq:HI (V8SI 90) (V8
ping
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 4:40 PM Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> Correct PR number in ChangeLog
> it's pr96243.
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 1:46 PM Hongtao Liu wrote:
> >
> > Hi:
> > For rtx like (eq:HI (V8SI 90) (V8SI 91)), cse will take it as a
> > boolean value and try to do some optimization. B
Correct PR number in ChangeLog
it's pr96243.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 1:46 PM Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> Hi:
> For rtx like (eq:HI (V8SI 90) (V8SI 91)), cse will take it as a
> boolean value and try to do some optimization. But it is not true for
> vector compare, also other places in rtl passes hol
Hi:
For rtx like (eq:HI (V8SI 90) (V8SI 91)), cse will take it as a
boolean value and try to do some optimization. But it is not true for
vector compare, also other places in rtl passes hold the same
assumption.
Bootstrap is ok, regression test is ok for i386 backend.
2020-07-20 Hongtao Liu
13 matches
Mail list logo
