On 9/19/23 08:56, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 3:48 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
OK.
I dont see anything in the early VRP processing now that would allow a
later pass to remove the unreachable unless it does its own analysis
like DOM might do.
Isn't it as simple as
if (i_2
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 3:48 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>
>
> On 9/18/23 02:53, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 4:45 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> >> Ive been looking at __builtin_unreachable () regressions. The
> >> fundamental problem seems to be a lack of consistent expectation
On 9/18/23 02:53, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 4:45 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
Ive been looking at __builtin_unreachable () regressions. The
fundamental problem seems to be a lack of consistent expectation for
when we remove it earlier than the final pass of VRP.After loo
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 4:45 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>
> Ive been looking at __builtin_unreachable () regressions. The
> fundamental problem seems to be a lack of consistent expectation for
> when we remove it earlier than the final pass of VRP.After looking
> through them, I think this pro
Ive been looking at __builtin_unreachable () regressions. The
fundamental problem seems to be a lack of consistent expectation for
when we remove it earlier than the final pass of VRP. After looking
through them, I think this provides a sensible approach.
Ranger is pretty good at providin
