On 01/05/15 07:01 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 04/30/2015 02:01 PM, Daniel Krügler wrote:
Shouldn't the "one-liner" forwarding function templates be declared
as inline? - Daniel
You are right.
This builds and tests clean on x86_64-linux.
OK?
Yes OK, thanks.
On 04/30/2015 02:01 PM, Daniel Krügler wrote:
Shouldn't the "one-liner" forwarding function templates be declared as
inline? - Daniel
You are right.
This builds and tests clean on x86_64-linux.
OK?
2015-05-01 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
Inline one-line erasure dispat
2015-04-30 16:44 GMT+02:00 Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>:
>
>> And make_array, which isn't in the working paper yet, so I'd prefer to
>> leave that part out for now.
>
> D'oh! Sorry about that.. Removed.
>>
>> The Doxygen @headername command tells users which header they are
>> supposed t
And make_array, which isn't in the working paper yet, so I'd prefer to
leave that part out for now.
D'oh! Sorry about that.. Removed.
The Doxygen @headername command tells users which header they are
supposed to include, rather than this one. Since there is no
header that's wrong. I'd just
On 30/04/15 07:33 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
This has been in me tree for a good while.
It is fairly simple and adds C++ experimental container erasure.
And make_array, which isn't in the working paper yet, so I'd prefer to
leave that part out for now.
Index: include/experimental/erase_
This has been in me tree for a good while.
It is fairly simple and adds C++ experimental container erasure.
Builds and tests cleanly on x86_64-linux.
OK?
Index: include/Makefile.am
===
--- include/Makefile.am (revision 222573)
+++
