On 08/31/2015 02:44 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> Apart from Richards comments:
>
> +/* Return UNCAST_BLOCK to pool. */
> +inline void
> +memory_block_pool::remove (void *uncast_block)
> +{
> + block_list *block = reinterpret_cast (uncast_block);
> + block->m_next = instance.m_blocks;
> + instan
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote:
> Hi, all.
> I'm pinging this patch:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg00030.html
>
> And adding some more changes to it (they are not complete yet - so they are
> more
> like an RFC).
> In this patch I also try to make obstac
Mikhail Maltsev writes:
> Hi, all.
> I'm pinging this patch:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg00030.html
A week and no reply, so FWIW: I really hope this goes in. malloc always
shows up high in my profiles too.
Just a couple of very minor things to show that I read the patch :-)
Hi, all.
I'm pinging this patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg00030.html
And adding some more changes to it (they are not complete yet - so they are more
like an RFC).
In this patch I also try to make obstacks use the same block pool as object
pools. This seems rather easy to impl
