Re: [PATCH] [testsuite] test for weak_undefined support and add options

2023-03-22 Thread Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
On Mar 18, 2023, Mike Stump wrote: > On Mar 15, 2023, at 11:40 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> >> On Mar 15, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> >>> Regstrapped on ppc64-linux-gnu. Also tested (with gcc-12) on multiple >>> *-vxworks7r2 targets (arm, aarch64, ppc64, x86, x86_64). Ok to install?

Re: [PATCH] [testsuite] test for weak_undefined support and add options

2023-03-18 Thread Mike Stump via Gcc-patches
On Mar 15, 2023, at 11:40 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > On Mar 15, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > >> Regstrapped on ppc64-linux-gnu. Also tested (with gcc-12) on multiple >> *-vxworks7r2 targets (arm, aarch64, ppc64, x86, x86_64). Ok to install? > > Further testing revealed a problem in my

Re: [PATCH] [testsuite] test for weak_undefined support and add options

2023-03-16 Thread Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
On Mar 15, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > Regstrapped on ppc64-linux-gnu. Also tested (with gcc-12) on multiple > *-vxworks7r2 targets (arm, aarch64, ppc64, x86, x86_64). Ok to install? Further testing revealed a problem in my attempted use of lappend in aapcs64.exp, in the previous version

[PATCH] [testsuite] test for weak_undefined support and add options

2023-03-15 Thread Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
A number of tests that depend on weak undefined symbols fail to require that support, and arrange to skip some targets and add special options to others on a test-by-test basis. Fix this by stating the requirement explicitly, and adding a proc to return any required options. Others rely on