RE: [PING][PATCH] [tree-optimization/110279] fix testcase pr110279-1.c

2024-07-15 Thread Di Zhao OS
Hi, Shall I push this if no objection? Thanks, Di Zhao > -Original Message- > From: Di Zhao OS > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 9:52 AM > To: Jeff Law > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: [PING][PATCH] [tree-optimization/110279] fix testcase pr110279-1.c > &

[PING][PATCH] [tree-optimization/110279] fix testcase pr110279-1.c

2024-06-17 Thread Di Zhao OS
This is OK for trunk? Thanks, Di Zhao > -Original Message- > From: Di Zhao OS > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2024 5:55 PM > To: Jeff Law > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH] [tree-optimization/110279] fix testcase pr110279-1.c > > > -Original

RE: [PATCH] [tree-optimization/110279] fix testcase pr110279-1.c

2024-05-23 Thread Di Zhao OS
> -Original Message- > From: Jeff Law > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2024 11:14 PM > To: Di Zhao OS ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] [tree-optimization/110279] fix testcase pr110279-1.c > > > > On 5/22/24 5:46 AM, Di Zhao OS wrote: >

Re: [PATCH] [tree-optimization/110279] fix testcase pr110279-1.c

2024-05-22 Thread Jeff Law
On 5/22/24 5:46 AM, Di Zhao OS wrote: The test case is for targets that support FMA. Previously the "target" selector is missed in dg-final command. Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Thanks Di Zhao gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/pr110279-1.c: add target selector. Rather than list

[PATCH] [tree-optimization/110279] fix testcase pr110279-1.c

2024-05-22 Thread Di Zhao OS
The test case is for targets that support FMA. Previously the "target" selector is missed in dg-final command. Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Thanks Di Zhao gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/pr110279-1.c: add target selector. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr110279-1.c | 2 +- 1 file