Re: [PATCH] --enable-cet={yes,no,auto} with default no

2018-04-19 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:24:15PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > > >> So untested patch would be something like: > > > > > > Yes, this is what I think should be the most appropriate approach. > > Here is the patch with slightly tweaked install.texi and the

Re: [PATCH] --enable-cet={yes,no,auto} with default no

2018-04-19 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 12:31 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:24:15PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: >> >> So untested patch would be something like: >> > >> > Yes, this is what I think should be the most appropriate approach. > > Here is the patch with slightly

Re: [PATCH] --enable-cet={yes,no,auto} with default no

2018-04-18 Thread H.J. Lu
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:24:15PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: >> >> So untested patch would be something like: >> > >> > Yes, this is what I think should be the most appropriate approach. > > Here is the patch with slightly

[PATCH] --enable-cet={yes,no,auto} with default no

2018-04-18 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:24:15PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > >> So untested patch would be something like: > > > > Yes, this is what I think should be the most appropriate approach. Here is the patch with slightly tweaked install.texi and the all the regenerated bits too. Bootstrapped/regtested on