Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:40:37PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > Are there any doc updates that need to happen as a result of this patch?
>> > Patch itself is fine for the trunk, just want to make sure the doc side is
>> > good too.
>>
>> You're right, I'll add documen
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:40:37PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Are there any doc updates that need to happen as a result of this patch?
> > Patch itself is fine for the trunk, just want to make sure the doc side is
> > good too.
>
> You're right, I'll add documentation tomorrow and repost the
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 01:32:42PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/05/15 09:58, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 04:47:06PM -0800, Alexey Samsonov wrote:
> >>Right, -fsanitize=all produces an error, while -fsanitize-recover=all
> >>enables recovery for all
> >>sanitizers, -fno-sanitiz
On 01/05/15 09:58, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 04:47:06PM -0800, Alexey Samsonov wrote:
Right, -fsanitize=all produces an error, while -fsanitize-recover=all
enables recovery for all
sanitizers, -fno-sanitize-recover=all disables recovery for everything.
Ok, here is a GCC patc
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 04:47:06PM -0800, Alexey Samsonov wrote:
> Right, -fsanitize=all produces an error, while -fsanitize-recover=all
> enables recovery for all
> sanitizers, -fno-sanitize-recover=all disables recovery for everything.
Ok, here is a GCC patch for that.
-fno-sanitize=all is suppo
