On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:45 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> I'm not sure either, but if it's been approved in gdb and you're
> willing to cede control of it to gcc's policies, I'm OK with it.
>
> Note that this will be a new directory in gcc, and I think the
> automerge scripts will automatically pick
I'm not sure either, but if it's been approved in gdb and you're
willing to cede control of it to gcc's policies, I'm OK with it.
Note that this will be a new directory in gcc, and I think the
automerge scripts will automatically pick it up. Which means, after
committing it, any future changes m
DJ,
Is the below patch your purview? If not, do you know whose it is?
Sterling
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sterling Augustine
Date: Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:52 AM
Subject: [PATCH] Add gdb/gdb-index.h to gcc tree.
To: gcc-patches , d...@redhat.com
The enclosed patch to
The enclosed patch to "merge" gdb/gdb-index.h from the src/ tree to
gcc is in preparation for a patch to migrage -ggnu-pubnames from
gcc/google-4_8 to trunk. This later patch adds a flag-byte to pubnames
so that the gold linker can build a version 7 gdb index. This file is
already used by gdb and b