Re: [PATCH] Allow nested use of attributes in MD-files

2013-05-22 Thread Kirill Yukhin
BTW, do we need to update GCC internals with this change? Thanks, K On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Kirill Yukhin wrote: >> Ok. > Thanks a lot! > Checked into trunk: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2013-05/msg00698.html > > Thanks, K

Re: [PATCH] Allow nested use of attributes in MD-files

2013-05-22 Thread Kirill Yukhin
> Ok. Thanks a lot! Checked into trunk: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2013-05/msg00698.html Thanks, K

Re: [PATCH] Allow nested use of attributes in MD-files

2013-05-21 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 04/26/2013 05:17 PM, Michael Zolotukhin wrote: > gcc/ChangeLog > 2013-04-26 Michael Zolotukhin > > * read-rtl.c (copy_rtx_for_iterators): Continue applying iterators > while it has any effect. Ok. Bernd

Re: [PATCH] Allow nested use of attributes in MD-files

2013-05-15 Thread Michael Zolotukhin
Ping. On 9 May 2013 17:07, Michael Zolotukhin wrote: >> Sweet, I like it… > Thanks! > Who could approve it for commit if it's ok? > > Best regards, Michael > > On 28 April 2013 23:43, Mike Stump wrote: >> On Apr 26, 2013, at 8:17 AM, Michael Zolotukhin >> wrote: >>> This patch allows to use at

Re: [PATCH] Allow nested use of attributes in MD-files

2013-05-09 Thread Michael Zolotukhin
> Sweet, I like it… Thanks! Who could approve it for commit if it's ok? Best regards, Michael On 28 April 2013 23:43, Mike Stump wrote: > On Apr 26, 2013, at 8:17 AM, Michael Zolotukhin > wrote: >> This patch allows to use attributes inside other attributes in MD-files. > > Sweet, I like it…

Re: [PATCH] Allow nested use of attributes in MD-files

2013-04-28 Thread Mike Stump
On Apr 26, 2013, at 8:17 AM, Michael Zolotukhin wrote: > This patch allows to use attributes inside other attributes in MD-files. Sweet, I like it…

[PATCH] Allow nested use of attributes in MD-files

2013-04-26 Thread Michael Zolotukhin
Hi, This patch allows to use attributes inside other attributes in MD-files. Currently we can't have an attribute depending on both mode and code - we have only mode attribute and code attribute and mode_attribute can't depend on the code. So, if we write, for example, (define_mode_attr attr_nam