On 2/14/24 3:55 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 14/02/2024 09:20, Tejas Belagod wrote:
On 2/7/24 11:41 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 07/02/2024 07:59, Tejas Belagod wrote:
This patch fixes a bug that causes indirect calls in PAC-enabled functions
to be tailcalled incorrectly wh
On 14/02/2024 09:20, Tejas Belagod wrote:
> On 2/7/24 11:41 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> On 07/02/2024 07:59, Tejas Belagod wrote:
>>> This patch fixes a bug that causes indirect calls in PAC-enabled functions
>>> to be tailcalled incorrectly when all argument registers R0-R3 are used.
>>
On 2/7/24 11:41 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 07/02/2024 07:59, Tejas Belagod wrote:
This patch fixes a bug that causes indirect calls in PAC-enabled functions
to be tailcalled incorrectly when all argument registers R0-R3 are used.
Tested on arm-none-eabi for armv8.1-m.main. OK for tr
On 07/02/2024 07:59, Tejas Belagod wrote:
> This patch fixes a bug that causes indirect calls in PAC-enabled functions
> to be tailcalled incorrectly when all argument registers R0-R3 are used.
>
> Tested on arm-none-eabi for armv8.1-m.main. OK for trunk?
>
> 2024-02-07 Tejas Belagod
>
>
This patch fixes a bug that causes indirect calls in PAC-enabled functions
to be tailcalled incorrectly when all argument registers R0-R3 are used.
Tested on arm-none-eabi for armv8.1-m.main. OK for trunk?
2024-02-07 Tejas Belagod
PR target/113780
* gcc/config/arm.cc (arm_func