On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 09:38:19PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
--- libcpp/expr.c.jj2015-01-14 11:01:34.0 +0100
+++ libcpp/expr.c 2015-01-14 14:35:52.851002344 +0100
@@ -672,16 +672,17 @@ cpp_classify_number (cpp_reader *pfile,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Anyway, in that case guess we also need to change unrelated:
--- libcpp/expr.c.jj 2015-01-05 13:07:21.0 +0100
+++ libcpp/expr.c 2015-01-16 12:54:56.517522643 +0100
@@ -696,9 +696,9 @@ cpp_classify_number (cpp_reader *pfile,
On 01/15/15 04:19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
With the addition of build libcpp, my build failed because of distro default
flags of -Werror=format-security.
The first hunk is I think no big deal, making it const makes the warning
go away.
The second hunk is more controversial, as even making
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
--- libcpp/expr.c.jj 2015-01-14 11:01:34.0 +0100
+++ libcpp/expr.c 2015-01-14 14:35:52.851002344 +0100
@@ -672,16 +672,17 @@ cpp_classify_number (cpp_reader *pfile,
if ((result CPP_N_WIDTH) == CPP_N_LARGE
CPP_OPTION
Hi!
With the addition of build libcpp, my build failed because of distro default
flags of -Werror=format-security.
The first hunk is I think no big deal, making it const makes the warning
go away.
The second hunk is more controversial, as even making message const doesn't
help with the warning.