On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >
> >> Richard Biener writes:
> >> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Richard Biener
Richard Biener writes:
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> >
>> >> Richard Biener writes:
>> >> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >
> >> Richard Biener writes:
> >> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Richard Biener
Richard Biener writes:
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> >
>> >> Richard Biener writes:
>> >> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >
> >> Richard Biener writes:
> >> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Sorry for the late reply, but:
> >> >>
Richard Biener writes:
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> >
>> >> Sorry for the late reply, but:
>> >>
>> >> Richard Biener writes:
>> >> > On
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry for the late reply, but:
> >>
> >> Richard Biener writes:
> >> > On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
Richard Biener writes:
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the late reply, but:
>>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>> > On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Currently we force peeling for gaps whenever element
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply, but:
>
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Currently we force peeling for gaps whenever element overrun can occur
> >> but for aligned accesses we know
Sorry for the late reply, but:
Richard Biener writes:
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>>
>> Currently we force peeling for gaps whenever element overrun can occur
>> but for aligned accesses we know that the loads won't trap and thus
>> we can avoid this.
>>
>>
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> Currently we force peeling for gaps whenever element overrun can occur
> but for aligned accesses we know that the loads won't trap and thus
> we can avoid this.
>
> Bootstrap and regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (I expect
> some
Currently we force peeling for gaps whenever element overrun can occur
but for aligned accesses we know that the loads won't trap and thus
we can avoid this.
Bootstrap and regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (I expect
some testsuite fallout here so didn't bother to invent a new
12 matches
Mail list logo