Re: [PATCH] Better comparison of BINFOs in IPA-CP

2011-09-06 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:24:36AM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the patch below improves the comparisons of BINFOs in IPA-CP. The > > problem is that we can read different BINFOs for the same type (or a > > base type component) from the LTO summaries because BINFOs coming from >

Re: [PATCH] Better comparison of BINFOs in IPA-CP

2011-09-05 Thread Jan Hubicka
> Hi, > > the patch below improves the comparisons of BINFOs in IPA-CP. The > problem is that we can read different BINFOs for the same type (or a > base type component) from the LTO summaries because BINFOs coming from > different compilation units are not unified. Because we now have the > BIN

Re: [PATCH] Better comparison of BINFOs in IPA-CP

2011-09-04 Thread Richard Guenther
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > the patch below improves the comparisons of BINFOs in IPA-CP.  The > problem is that we can read different BINFOs for the same type (or a > base type component) from the LTO summaries because BINFOs coming from > different compilation

[PATCH] Better comparison of BINFOs in IPA-CP

2011-09-03 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, the patch below improves the comparisons of BINFOs in IPA-CP. The problem is that we can read different BINFOs for the same type (or a base type component) from the LTO summaries because BINFOs coming from different compilation units are not unified. Because we now have the BINFO_VTABLE avai