Re: [PATCH] Change __ARM_NEON__ to __ARM_NEON in libcpp/lex.c

2015-02-02 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 02/02/15 15:34, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > > > On 30/01/15 19:14, Richard Henderson wrote: >> On 01/30/2015 04:52 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: >>> When running natively on AArch64 the preprocessor did not use the >>> AdvSIMD optimized search_line_fast function, because it was ifdefed >>> around by __A

Re: [PATCH] Change __ARM_NEON__ to __ARM_NEON in libcpp/lex.c

2015-02-02 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 30/01/15 19:14, Richard Henderson wrote: On 01/30/2015 04:52 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: When running natively on AArch64 the preprocessor did not use the AdvSIMD optimized search_line_fast function, because it was ifdefed around by __ARM_NEON__ instead of __ARM_NEON. Yes, sorry I didn't fol

Re: [PATCH] Change __ARM_NEON__ to __ARM_NEON in libcpp/lex.c

2015-01-30 Thread Richard Henderson
On 01/30/2015 04:52 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > When running natively on AArch64 the preprocessor did not use the > AdvSIMD optimized search_line_fast function, because it was ifdefed > around by __ARM_NEON__ instead of __ARM_NEON. Yes, sorry I didn't follow up on that from September: https://gc

Re: [PATCH] Change __ARM_NEON__ to __ARM_NEON in libcpp/lex.c

2015-01-30 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 30/01/15 12:52, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > Hello, > > When running natively on AArch64 the preprocessor did not use the > AdvSIMD optimized search_line_fast function, because it was ifdefed > around by __ARM_NEON__ instead of __ARM_NEON. > > (The ARM C Language Extensions specifies the __ARM_NEON

[PATCH] Change __ARM_NEON__ to __ARM_NEON in libcpp/lex.c

2015-01-30 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
Hello, When running natively on AArch64 the preprocessor did not use the AdvSIMD optimized search_line_fast function, because it was ifdefed around by __ARM_NEON__ instead of __ARM_NEON. (The ARM C Language Extensions specifies the __ARM_NEON macro, but not __ARM_NEON__ which is legacy and thus