From: Andrew Pinski <apin...@marvell.com>

With the recent PHI-OPT patch for line numbers, I had missed this
testcase was now failing. The uninitialized warning was there
before my recent patch, just was on the wrong line. The testcase
had added an xfail in r12-4698-gf6d012338 (though a bug report was
not filed to record it).
This patch changes the dg-bogus messages around to catch both locations
and xfail both of them.

At least there is now a patch for the correct line numbers for the
phi-opt.

Committed after testing the testcase.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.dg/uninit-pr89230-1.c: Change the dg-bogus messages
        around and xfail both of them.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pr89230-1.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pr89230-1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pr89230-1.c
index dfc87a5b1a0..bf536e2e65a 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pr89230-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pr89230-1.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ struct S { int i, j; };
 int g (void)
 {
   struct S *p = f ();
-  struct S *q; // { dg-bogus "may be used uninitialized" "uninitialized" { 
xfail *-*-* } }
+  struct S *q; // { dg-bogus "" "uninitialized" { xfail *-*-* } }
 
   if (p->i || !(q = f ()) || p->j != q->i)
    {
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ int g (void)
      if (p->i)
        return 1;
 
-     if (!q)        // { dg-bogus "\\\[-Wmaybe-uninitialized" }
+     if (!q)        // { dg-bogus "\\\[-Wmaybe-uninitialized" "" { xfail *-*-* 
} }
        return 2;
    }
 
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to