Re: [PATCH] DOCUMENTATION_ROOT_URL vs. release branches [PR114738]

2024-06-15 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 09:47:04PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > There should be *very* few user visible changes such as new options or > substantially different behaviors on release branches - pretty much by > definition. In reality there are tons of changes, people add new options even on rel

Re: [PATCH] DOCUMENTATION_ROOT_URL vs. release branches [PR114738]

2024-06-15 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024, David Malcolm wrote: > My hope is that the URL suffixes don't change: we shouldn't be adding > new command-line options on the release branches, and I'd hope that > texinfo doesn't change the generated anchors from run to run. Already before this thread, but definitely now, I

Re: [PATCH] DOCUMENTATION_ROOT_URL vs. release branches [PR114738]

2024-04-23 Thread David Malcolm
On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 17:45 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:40:55AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > > > So, I think at least for the MAJOR.MINOR.0 releases we want to > > > use > > > URLs like above rather than the trunk ones and we can use the > > > same > > > process > > >

Re: [PATCH] DOCUMENTATION_ROOT_URL vs. release branches [PR114738]

2024-04-23 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:40:55AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > > So, I think at least for the MAJOR.MINOR.0 releases we want to use > > URLs like above rather than the trunk ones and we can use the same > > process > > of updating *.opt.urls as well for that. > > Would it make sense to instead u

Re: [PATCH] DOCUMENTATION_ROOT_URL vs. release branches [PR114738]

2024-04-23 Thread David Malcolm
On Wed, 2024-04-17 at 13:16 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > Starting with GCC 14 we have the nice URLification of the options > printed > in diagnostics, say for in > test.c:4:23: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but > argument 2 has type ‘long int’ [-Wformat=] > the -Wfo

Re: [PATCH] DOCUMENTATION_ROOT_URL vs. release branches [PR114738]

2024-04-17 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 1:17 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Hi! > > Starting with GCC 14 we have the nice URLification of the options printed > in diagnostics, say for in > test.c:4:23: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but > argument 2 has type ‘long int’ [-Wformat=] > the -Wform

[PATCH] DOCUMENTATION_ROOT_URL vs. release branches [PR114738]

2024-04-17 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! Starting with GCC 14 we have the nice URLification of the options printed in diagnostics, say for in test.c:4:23: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 2 has type ‘long int’ [-Wformat=] the -Wformat= is underlined in some terminals and hovering on it shows https://