On 19 October 2017 10:03:06 CEST, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 09:46:17PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>wrote:
>> On December 3, 2015 10:46:09 AM GMT+01:00, Janne Blomqvist
> wrote:
>> >On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:51
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 09:46:17PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On December 3, 2015 10:46:09 AM GMT+01:00, Janne Blomqvist
> wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> > wrote:
> >> On 1 December 2015 at
On December 3, 2015 10:46:09 AM GMT+01:00, Janne Blomqvist
wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> wrote:
>> On 1 December 2015 at 15:52, Janne Blomqvist
> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> On 1 December 2015 at 15:52, Janne Blomqvist
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> wrote:
>>> These three function used a
On 1 December 2015 at 15:52, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> wrote:
>> These three function used a hardcoded buffer of 100 but would be better
>> off to base off GFC_MAX_SYMBOL_LEN which denotes
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> These three function used a hardcoded buffer of 100 but would be better
> off to base off GFC_MAX_SYMBOL_LEN which denotes the maximum length of a
> name in any of our supported standards (63 as of f2003