Re: [PATCH] Derive interface buffers from max name length

2017-10-20 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On 19 October 2017 10:03:06 CEST, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 09:46:17PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer >wrote: >> On December 3, 2015 10:46:09 AM GMT+01:00, Janne Blomqvist > wrote: >> >On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:51

Re: [PATCH] Derive interface buffers from max name length

2017-10-19 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 09:46:17PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On December 3, 2015 10:46:09 AM GMT+01:00, Janne Blomqvist > wrote: > >On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > > wrote: > >> On 1 December 2015 at

Re: [PATCH] Derive interface buffers from max name length

2016-06-18 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On December 3, 2015 10:46:09 AM GMT+01:00, Janne Blomqvist wrote: >On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > wrote: >> On 1 December 2015 at 15:52, Janne Blomqvist > wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at

Re: [PATCH] Derive interface buffers from max name length

2015-12-03 Thread Janne Blomqvist
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On 1 December 2015 at 15:52, Janne Blomqvist > wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer >> wrote: >>> These three function used a

Re: [PATCH] Derive interface buffers from max name length

2015-12-01 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On 1 December 2015 at 15:52, Janne Blomqvist wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > wrote: >> These three function used a hardcoded buffer of 100 but would be better >> off to base off GFC_MAX_SYMBOL_LEN which denotes

Re: [PATCH] Derive interface buffers from max name length

2015-12-01 Thread Janne Blomqvist
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > These three function used a hardcoded buffer of 100 but would be better > off to base off GFC_MAX_SYMBOL_LEN which denotes the maximum length of a > name in any of our supported standards (63 as of f2003