>
> Jeff et. al.
>
> > On 9 Jun 2021, at 17:23, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > On 5/25/2021 2:23 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> >> The GCC manual's documentation of -fno-trampolines was apparently
> >> written from an Ada point of view. However, when I read it I
> >> understandably
On 6/9/2021 12:15 PM, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
On 2021-06-09 09:23, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 5/25/2021 2:23 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
The GCC manual's documentation of -fno-trampolines was apparently
written from an Ada point of view. However, when I read it I
understandably mistook
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 11:15 AM Thomas Rodgers
wrote:
>
> On 2021-06-09 09:23, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > On 5/25/2021 2:23 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> >
> >> The GCC manual's documentation of -fno-trampolines was apparently
> >> written from an Ada point of view. However, when I read it
Jeff et. al.
> On 9 Jun 2021, at 17:23, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> On 5/25/2021 2:23 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
>> The GCC manual's documentation of -fno-trampolines was apparently
>> written from an Ada point of view. However, when I read it I
>> understandably mistook it to say that
On 2021-06-09 09:23, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 5/25/2021 2:23 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
The GCC manual's documentation of -fno-trampolines was apparently
written from an Ada point of view. However, when I read it I
understandably mistook it to say that -fno-trampolines also works for
C,
On 5/25/2021 2:23 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
The GCC manual's documentation of -fno-trampolines was apparently
written from an Ada point of view. However, when I read it I
understandably mistook it to say that -fno-trampolines also works for
C, C++, etc. It doesn't: it is silently ignored for
The GCC manual's documentation of -fno-trampolines was apparently
written from an Ada point of view. However, when I read it I
understandably mistook it to say that -fno-trampolines also works for
C, C++, etc. It doesn't: it is silently ignored for these languages,
and I assume for any language
