Re: [PATCH] Don't try to perform conditional_replacement on vectors (PR tree-optimization/53748)

2012-07-01 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 25/06/2012 16:44, Jakub Jelinek ha scritto: > Hi! > > On vectors, even when they satisfy > integer_zerop/integer_onep/integer_all_onesp, the routine doesn't > handle vector types and it is questionable if it would be a good > optimization for them anyway. I think it's not questionable at all,

Re: [PATCH] Don't try to perform conditional_replacement on vectors (PR tree-optimization/53748)

2012-06-26 Thread Richard Guenther
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > On vectors, even when they satisfy > integer_zerop/integer_onep/integer_all_onesp, the routine doesn't > handle vector types and it is questionable if it would be a good > optimization for them anyway. We don't handle complex there either, > so

[PATCH] Don't try to perform conditional_replacement on vectors (PR tree-optimization/53748)

2012-06-25 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! On vectors, even when they satisfy integer_zerop/integer_onep/integer_all_onesp, the routine doesn't handle vector types and it is questionable if it would be a good optimization for them anyway. We don't handle complex there either, so this patch limits it to integral/pointer types. Bootstr