On 11/14/20 1:33 PM, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 5:27 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 1/14/20 5:05 PM, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
>>> Hello-
>>>
>>> I thought I might ping this short patch please, just in case it may
>>> make sense to include in GCC 10 along with the other UTF-8-related
>>
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 5:27 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 1/14/20 5:05 PM, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
> > Hello-
> >
> > I thought I might ping this short patch please, just in case it may
> > make sense to include in GCC 10 along with the other UTF-8-related
> > fixes to diagnostics. Thanks!
> >
> > https
On 1/14/20 5:05 PM, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
> Hello-
>
> I thought I might ping this short patch please, just in case it may
> make sense to include in GCC 10 along with the other UTF-8-related
> fixes to diagnostics. Thanks!
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg00915.html
This is fine f
Hello-
I thought I might ping this short patch please, just in case it may
make sense to include in GCC 10 along with the other UTF-8-related
fixes to diagnostics. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg00915.html
-Lewis
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:21 PM Lewis Hyatt wrote:
>
> Hel
Hello-
In the original discussion of implementing UTF-8 identifiers
( https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67224#c26 ), I pointed out
that colorization would corrupt the appearance of certain diagnostics. For
example, this code, with -std=c99:
--
int ٩x;
--
Produces:
t2.
