On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 at 18:46, François Dumont wrote:
>
>
> On 03/06/2024 18:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 at 05:56, François Dumont wrote:
> >> I hadn't try to make my patch as limited as possible to fix the problem,
> >> indeed.
> >>
> >> libstdc++: Fix -Wstringop-overfl
On 03/06/2024 18:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 at 05:56, François Dumont wrote:
I hadn't try to make my patch as limited as possible to fix the problem,
indeed.
libstdc++: Fix -Wstringop-overflow warning coming from std::vector
[PR109849]
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 at 05:56, François Dumont wrote:
>
> I hadn't try to make my patch as limited as possible to fix the problem,
> indeed.
>
> libstdc++: Fix -Wstringop-overflow warning coming from std::vector
> [PR109849]
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
> PR libstdc++/109849
I hadn't try to make my patch as limited as possible to fix the problem,
indeed.
libstdc++: Fix -Wstringop-overflow warning coming from std::vector
[PR109849]
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/109849
* include/bits/vector.tcc
(std::vector<>::_M_
On Thu, 30 May 2024 at 06:11, François Dumont wrote:
>
> Looks like this new version works the same to fix the warning without
> the issues reported here.
>
> All 23_containers/vector tests run in C++98/14/20 so far.
>
> Ok to commit once I've complete the testsuite (or some bot did it for me
> !)
Looks like this new version works the same to fix the warning without
the issues reported here.
All 23_containers/vector tests run in C++98/14/20 so far.
Ok to commit once I've complete the testsuite (or some bot did it for me
!) ?
I'll look for a PR to associate, if you have one in mind do
On 27/05/24 22:07 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
In C++98 this test fails with:
Excess errors:
/home/fdumont/dev/gcc/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algobase.h:452:
warning: 'void* __builtin_memcpy(void*, const void*, long unsigned
int)' writing between 2 and 92233720368
Sure, I'll try to have a look.
But for the moment this patch introduces some regressions so I keep on
working on it.
FAIL: 23_containers/vector/modifiers/moveable.cc -std=gnu++14 execution
test
FAIL: 23_containers/vector/modifiers/moveable2.cc -std=gnu++14
execution test
On 27/05/2024 22
François Dumont writes:
> In C++98 this test fails with:
For this, and your other -Wfree-nonheap-object patches, could you see if
it helps with any of the bugs reported for both -Wstringop-overflow and
-Wfree-nonheap-object in libstdc++? There's a bunch of (possible) dupes
that it'd be worth tag
In C++98 this test fails with:
Excess errors:
/home/fdumont/dev/gcc/build/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algobase.h:452:
warning: 'void* __builtin_memcpy(void*, const void*, long unsigned int)'
writing between 2 and 9223372036854775806 bytes into a region of size 0
overflows
10 matches
Mail list logo
