On 11/5/18 4:20 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 11/5/18 1:28 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 10:02 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 10/22/18 9:08 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi!
This makes c_strlen avoid an unsafe strlen folding of const arguments
with non-const offset. Cur
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:20 PM Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
> On 11/5/18 1:28 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 10:02 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/22/18 9:08 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> >>> Hi!
> >>>
> >>> This makes c_strlen avoid an unsafe strlen folding of const arguments
> >>> wi
On 11/5/18 1:28 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 10:02 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 10/22/18 9:08 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> This makes c_strlen avoid an unsafe strlen folding of const arguments
>>> with non-const offset. Currently a negative out of bounds offset
>>> make
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 10:02 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 10/22/18 9:08 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > This makes c_strlen avoid an unsafe strlen folding of const arguments
> > with non-const offset. Currently a negative out of bounds offset
> > makes the strlen function return an extreme
On 10/22/18 9:08 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This makes c_strlen avoid an unsafe strlen folding of const arguments
> with non-const offset. Currently a negative out of bounds offset
> makes the strlen function return an extremely large number, and
> at the same time, prevents the VRP mach
Ping...
For this patch here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-10/msg01336.html
Thanks
Bernd.
On 10/22/18 5:08 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This makes c_strlen avoid an unsafe strlen folding of const arguments
> with non-const offset. Currently a negative out of bounds offset
> ma
On 10/22/18 9:03 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 10/22/2018 09:08 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> This makes c_strlen avoid an unsafe strlen folding of const arguments
>> with non-const offset. Currently a negative out of bounds offset
>> makes the strlen function return an extremely large num
On 10/22/2018 09:08 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi!
This makes c_strlen avoid an unsafe strlen folding of const arguments
with non-const offset. Currently a negative out of bounds offset
makes the strlen function return an extremely large number, and
at the same time, prevents the VRP machinery,
Hi!
This makes c_strlen avoid an unsafe strlen folding of const arguments
with non-const offset. Currently a negative out of bounds offset
makes the strlen function return an extremely large number, and
at the same time, prevents the VRP machinery, to determine the correct
range if the strlen fun