[PATCH] Fix PR49484, gthr requirements update (target maintainers have a looksee)

2012-01-18 Thread Richard Guenther
This fixes PR49484 by protecting __gcov_flush against concurrent execution. To be able to use the gthread facility I have to introduce the requirement that __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION is always available, even if __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT is available as otherwise no dynamic initialization of a mute

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR49484, gthr requirements update (target maintainers have a looksee)

2012-03-05 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Richard Guenther wrote: > > This fixes PR49484 by protecting __gcov_flush against concurrent > execution.  To be able to use the gthread facility I have to > introduce the requirement that __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION > is always available, even if __GTHREAD_MUTEX

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR49484, gthr requirements update (target maintainers have a looksee)

2012-03-12 Thread Richard Guenther
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Richard Guenther wrote: >> >> This fixes PR49484 by protecting __gcov_flush against concurrent >> execution.  To be able to use the gthread facility I have to >> introduce the requirement that __GTHREAD_MUT

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR49484, gthr requirements update (target maintainers have a looksee)

2012-03-12 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Richard Guenther wrote: >>> 2012-01-18  Richard Guenther   >>> >>>        * gthr.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Adjust specification. >>>        * gthr-posix.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Define. >>>        (__gthread_mutex_init_function): New function. >>>        * gt

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR49484, gthr requirements update (target maintainers have a looksee)

2012-03-13 Thread Richard Guenther
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Richard Guenther wrote: 2012-01-18  Richard Guenther          * gthr.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Adjust specification.        * gthr-posix.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Define.      

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR49484, gthr requirements update (target maintainers have a looksee)

2012-03-13 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Richard Guenther wrote: > 2012-01-18  Richard Guenther   > >        * gthr.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Adjust specification. >        *

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR49484, gthr requirements update (target maintainers have a looksee)

2012-03-13 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 13/03/12 10:05, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Richard Guenther > wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Richard Guenther wrote: >> 2012-01-18 Richard Guenther >> >>* gthr.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR49484, gthr requirements update (target maintainers have a looksee)

2012-03-13 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > On 13/03/12 10:05, Richard Guenther wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Richard Guenther >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Richard Guenther wrote: >>> 2012-01-18  

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR49484, gthr requirements update (target maintainers have a looksee)

2012-03-14 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, Richard Guenther wrote: > Goes back to rev. 5880 by rms, at which time tsystem.h did not exist. > > I'm going to remove those two lines, bootstrap & test it and commit as > obvious. Thanks, Richard. I could not do the tests you suggested yesterday before seeing this other ma