On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 14:41 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:24 PM, William J. Schmidt
> wrote:
> > This fixes http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50969 by slightly
> > raising the cost of vector permutes on powerpc64 VSX targets (and
> > ensuring those costs are
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:24 PM, William J. Schmidt
wrote:
> This fixes http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50969 by slightly
> raising the cost of vector permutes on powerpc64 VSX targets (and
> ensuring those costs are correctly used). This reverses the performance
> loss for 168.wupwise
This fixes http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50969 by slightly
raising the cost of vector permutes on powerpc64 VSX targets (and
ensuring those costs are correctly used). This reverses the performance
loss for 168.wupwise, and gives a slight boost to 433.milc as well.
In the long run, w